BOOKKEEPER'S $3.4
MILLION EMBEZZLE-
MENT FORCES
4-DAY SCHOOL
WEEK (NEW MEXICO)
WHERE WE ARE  
Parents and educators have been arguing over what and how
kids should learn ever since socialist progressive idealogues
began selling questionable and expensive curricular programs to
public schools paid for by increased taxation.

While they may lack educators' 30-minute online doctorates,
parents smart enough to buy houses and pay property taxes are
smart enough to know that kids need to learn basic math skills in
the same stepped progression that's worked for centuries.

The irony is that although most Math Wars parents and taxpayers
have confined their arguments to theoretical disagreements with
How we went from best to
sub-par:  
Long ago our schools
taught our kids to memorize basics &
the classics. We had a shared
common culture; our citizens could
think for themselves and run their own
small farms and businesses.  This was
the great American constitutional
republic that freed itself from our
British, French, Spanish & Mexican
rulers.
P E Y T O N   W O L C O T T
C O M M E N T A R Y :     Our nation's move from 13,900 local independent schools towards 70,
every one of them under the thumb of Washington, DC . . . . and how we can prevent 70 Detroits.
ATTENTION EDUCATORS AND ADMINISTRATORS:
Every attempt possible has been made to verify all sources and information.   In the event you feel an error has been made, please contact us immediately.  Thank you.
NOTICE: All individuals mentioned on this site are presumed innocent unless they have been found guilty in a court of law.
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.   We are making such material available in our efforts to
advance understanding of education issues vital to a republic.  We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law.  In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., Chapter 1, Section 107 which states:  the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any
other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright,"  the material on
this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.   If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond "fair use" you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Copyright 1999-2009 Peyton Wolcott
John Taylor Gatto also 'splains it all
If you haven't seen it, here's an excerpt from
former New York Teacher of the Year John
Taylor Gatto's brief and entertaining
history
of U.S. public schools:
WHERE WE WERE
WHERE WE'RE HEADED
Socialiism, corruption, bad-ed ed. Our future, if we
continue down this path, is as a nation of serfs ruled by an
oligarchy who extend special privileges to the 10% elite
who live in
dachas, send their kids to classical lyceums--
The real makers of
modern schooling

weren't at all who we
think. Not Cotton Mather
or Horace Mann or
John Dewey (above
left).   The real makers
of modern schooling
were leaders of the
new American
industrialist class, men
like Andrew Carnegie,
the steel baron, John
D. Rockefeller, the
duke of oil, Henry Ford,
master of the assembly
line which compounded
steel and oil into a
Our first schools were simple
structures, often one room, often
affiliated with churches, and built by
community members themselves.
(1) Socialist liberals
emphasize common good over
individual accomplishment, the team
matters more than the person. group  
before individual effort, socialism over
a free market economy.
(2) Industrialists
Men like Rockefeller and Carnegie and
Henry Ford (who was both pro-Nazi and
pro-eugenics) all sought a compliant
worker class, folks inured to boredom by a
dumbed-down curriculum who'd show up
and do mindless work without asking too
many questions.
 (RELATED:  If you haven't
read it yet, New York Times reporter Edwin
Black's book
IBM and the Holocaust
establishes IBM founder Tom Watson's role
in the Nazi's efficient murder of 14 million.)
(3) Vendors
Thanks to crippling union demands coupled
with tougher environmental laws, most U.S.
industry has over the past half-century left
our shores for Asia and other friendlier
points abroad.  In fairness to them, who's
left for HP and other vendors to sell their
wares to if not public schools and other
governmental entities?

Would you like to learn more?  Here are two
sources with more information:
THE COMMON INTEREST BEFORE
SELF-INTEREST -- THAT IS THE SPIRIT
OF THE PROGRAM.   BREAKING OF THE
THRALDOM OF INTEREST -- THAT IS
THE KERNEL OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM.
                      --Adolf Hitler, 1929
with everyone else deprived
of their personal freedoms and
fighting for meager resources
including bad schools, old
Havana-style cars & cheap
drink, doing shoddy work that
does not matter. Foreclosed
McMansions will be divvied
up into homes for multiple
families, and women will
dream dreams of QVC.
PROPOSED SCHOOL NATIONALIZATION SCHEME
Hey, Lou & Arne: Let's NOT abolish local
school districts or adopt national standards!
And how's about let's NOT become socialists!
15,000 school districts" -- without
offering any facts to back up his
assertion.  (In fairness to Lou,
how could he?  There aren't any.)

And by finding fault with the
structure of public education then
suggesting consolidation, Lou
isn't using any of that famous IBM
logic.  To consolidate 15,000
structures would simply lead to
70 really corrupt structures -- with
even less accountability than we
have at present.  

He says, " we continually fail to
scale up systemic change" as
though that's a bad thing.  As one
recent example, Mr. Obama is
attempting wholesale
widespread systemic change in
our nation's governance and a lot
of us don't like what he's doing
and how he's going about it.  



But in fairness to Lou, how could
he?

There are no statistics available
in the public school world
supporting cost-savings via
consolidation.  

Why?  In public schools even the
most promising  gains disappear
after the first year for one simple
reason:  Public schools have no
equivalent to IBM's floors of
Lessons From 40 Years of Education
'Reform'















Let's abolish local school districts and
finally adopt national standards.
By Louis V. Gerstner, Jr.
Wall Street Journal
December 1, 2008

While the economic news has most
Americans in a state of near depression,
hope abounds today that the country may
use the current economic crisis as
leverage to address some longstanding
problems. Nowhere is that prospect for
progress more worthy than the crisis in
our public education system.

So, from someone who realized rather
glumly last week that he has been working
at school reform for 40 years, here is a
prescription for leadership from the Obama
administration.

We must start with the recognition that,
despite decade after decade of reform
efforts, our public K-12 schools have not
improved. We can point to individual
schools and some entire districts that have
advanced, but the system as a whole is
still failing. High school and college
graduation rates, test scores, the number
of graduates majoring in science and
engineering all are flat or down over the
past two decades. Disappointingly, the
relative performance of our students has
suffered compared to those of other
nations. As a former CEO, I am worried
about what this will mean for our future
workforce.

It is most crucial for our political leaders to
ask why we are at this point -- why after
millions of pages, in thousands of reports,
from hundreds of commissions and task
forces, financed by billions of dollars,
have we failed to achieve any significant
progress?

Answering this question correctly is the
key to finally remaking our public schools.

This is a complex problem, but countless
experiments and analyses have clearly
indicated we need to do four
straightforward things to bring
fundamental changes to K-12 education:

1) Set high academic standards for all of
our kids, supported by a rigorous
curriculum.

2) Greatly improve the quality of teaching
in our classrooms, supported by
substantially higher compensation for our
best teachers.

3) Measure student and teacher
performance on a systematic basis,
supported by tests and assessments.

4) Increase "time on task" for all students;
this means more time in school each day,
and a longer school year.

Everything else either does not matter
(e.g., smaller class sizes) or is supportive
of these four steps (e.g., vastly improve
schools of education).

Lack of effort is not the cause of our
30-year inability to solve our education
problem. Not only have we had all those
thousands of studies and task forces, but
we have seen many courageous and
talented individuals pushing hard to move
the system. Leaders such as Joel Klein
(New York City), Michelle Rhee
(Washington, D.C.) and Paul Vallas (New
Orleans) have challenged the system, and
elected officials from both sides of the
political spectrum have also fought
valiantly for change.

So where does that leave us? If the
problem isn't "what to do," nor is it a failure
of commitment, what is stopping us?

I believe the problem lies with the structure
and corporate governance of our public
schools. We have over 15,000 school
districts in America; each of them, in its
own way, is involved in standards,
curriculum, teacher selection, classroom
rules and so on. This unbelievably
unwieldy structure is incapable of
executing a program of fundamental
change. While we have islands of
excellence as a result of great reform
programs, we continually fail to scale up
systemic change.

Therefore, I recommend that
President-elect Barack Obama convene a
meeting of our nation's governors and
seek agreement to the following:

- Abolish all local school districts, save 70
(50 states; 20 largest cities). Some states
may choose to leave some of the rest as
community service organizations, but they
would have no direct involvement in the
critical task of establishing standards,
selecting teachers, and developing
curricula.

- Establish a set of national standards for
a core curriculum. I would suggest we
start with four subjects: reading, math,
science and social studies.

- Establish a National Skills Day on which
every third, sixth, ninth and 12th-grader
would be tested against the national
standards. Results would be published
nationwide for every school in America.

- Establish national standards for teacher
certification and require regular
re-evaluations of teacher skills. Increase
teacher compensation to permit the best
teachers (as measured by advances in
student learning) to earn well in excess of
$100,000 per year, and allow school
leaders to remove underperforming
teachers.

- Extend the school day and the school
year to effectively add 20 more days of
schooling for all K-12 students.

I can predict that three questions will be
raised about these measures:

First, how can we set national standards
when we have a strong tradition of local
school autonomy? The answer is that the
American people are way ahead of our
politicians here: Poll after poll shows they
support national standards.

Second, won't this take many years to
implement? No, if we follow a focused,
pragmatic approach. While ideally we
want all 50 states to participate, we can
get started with 30. The rest will be driven
to abandon their "see no evil" blinders by
their citizens as the original group
achieves momentum and success.
Moreover, we do not have to start from
scratch on the national standards. Experts
can quickly develop an initial set just by
drawing on existing domestic and foreign
programs.

Third, how do we pay for all of this? In
three ways: We will save billions by
consolidating the operations of 15,000
school districts. The U.S. Department of
Education can direct all of its discretionary
funds to this effort. And we need to drive
into the consciousness of every American
politician that education is not an expense.
It is, rather, the most important investment
we can make as a country.

H.G. Wells remarked that "history is a race
between education and catastrophe." For
the first time in America's history, we may
be losing that race. We can win, but we
have to act quickly and decisively.

Mr. Gerstner, a former CEO of IBM, was
chairman of the Teaching Commission
(2003-2006), which reported on ways to
improve the quality of public school
teaching.
Couple Mr. Obama's September 8
curriculum-accompanied address
to America's schoolchildren with
new Secretary of Education Arne
Duncan's recent call for nationalized
standards and this suddenly
becomes a great time to examine
Consolidation detriment #1:
But which & whose national standards?
Because there's no there already there in American public schools, because we
as a nation have no previously agreed-on absolute national standards already
set in place, the introduction of national standards now, at this late date, far from
being a strictly educational change, would be, after 233 years, an imposition that
given the crucial role played by our public schools would slide us into oligarchy,
socialism and fascism.  
(L) 1950s Russian peasants admire privileged
elite.
(Life Magazine)  Mr. Obama's 31 White House
"Czars"
(IMAGE--Taxpayers for Common Sense/Fox News)
1906:  Baltimore's Oblate Sisters started
evening classes for "Bobbin Girls" and
"Breaker Boys" working in textile factories.
Victorian-era school room
Traditional or fuzzy?  History or social studies?  What kind of
math will Mr. Gerstner's proposed national standards
include?  Will it be time-proven traditional math which teaches
facts or will it be the National Classroom Teachers of
Mathematics' fuzzy non-traditional standards emphasizing
process instead,
US DOE Secretary Arne
Duncan (L)  Mr. Obama (R)
Adolf Hitler with schoolchildren
Why would national standards be a problem now?  
While it's easy to see that the implied neatness and Excel spreadsheet mathe-
matical tidiness of a precise set of national standards might likely hold a
certain plausible appeal for CEOs like Mr. Gerstner, kind of like running a corpo-
ration without having to answer to shareholders, extrapolating this out, such a
CEO might also enjoy living in a dictatorship -- provided he gets to be dictator.  
the two chief pratfalls in Mr. Gerstner's and
Mr. Duncan's consolidation/national
standards scheme.   (the first and most
crucial step towards federal takeover of our
local schools
such process contributing to half the kids now entering college needing
remedial instruction in core subjects such as math?  

Or, what about history?  Will the proposed national standards include
the study of history -- real events that happened to real people -- or its
fuzzier sibling, social studies?  Will the proposed national standards
align with the camp advocating that third-graders receive a study page
on Sheryl Crow as occurred in one upscale exemplary Texas school not
so long ago? If so, will the proposed standards change when the rock
star changes her T-shirt to reflect favor or disfavor with each new
president and each new war, if Ms. Crow likes Mr. Obama's Afghan war?
BOTTOM
LINE:  
He who
writes and
funds the
standards
controls the
outcome.
Sheryl Crow
Consolidation detriment #2:
Fraud & waste
Fewer school districts -- Mr. Gerstner
wants only one per state plus another
20 for each of our biggest cities (like
Detroit or Chicago, maybe?) -- will
result in bigger
piles of money with
fewer eyes watching not only the money
but also the pencils, erasers and
laptops. Ever-larger piles of money
attract ever more comers.  

It may surprise you to learn that not
each and every vendor is putting our
kids' and taxpayers' best interests
ahead of their own.  

And we've seen from public school
scandals involving federal funds that
bureaucrats are at best indifferent
stewards of other people's money
compared to the people paying the
taxes.

No-account accountability
Unlike IBM and every other major viable
American business where there are
floors if not buildings filled with bean
counters making sure every purchase
has all I's dotted and T's crossed, just
the opposite is true of public schools.
The trail of $4.3 million from Utah's Davis School District to Susan G. and
John Ross via two shell companies (Research & Development, Inc. and
Notable Education Writing Service, Inc.) depicted at right in local NBC TV
station KSL's graphic omits two crucial groups:  (1) The United States
Department of Education which sends billions in Title I and other federal
funds to school districts such as Davis SD and (2) Davis SD superintendent
W. Bryan Bowles and his 7-member school board who bear ultimate
responsibility for spending and overseeing the millions receives in Title I --
and other state, federal and local -- funds
MOONLIGHTING
SUPE'S TIES TO
501(c) VENDORS
(CALIFORNIA)
MOONLIGHTING
ADMINISTRATORS'
TIES TO TITLE I
FUNDS (UTAH)
You're tempted to pity
poor Anthony Amato.   
First it was New
Orleans, then Kansas
City, now it's his new
gig as superintendent
of California's
Stockton USD
(located between San
Francisco and
Yosemite).  

The trouble this time
appears to arise from
Anthony's recommen-
dation that Stockton
USD spend $12
million on a product
from a client of his
part-time employer,
Education Research
& Development
Institute (ERDI), a
501(c) corporation,
the same product he
also recommended to
prior bosses in
Kansas City and New
Orleans where he
testified last month in
the bribery trial of
Mose Jefferson, the
brother of former
Congressman
William Jefferson,
regarding the selling
of yet another 501(c)
corporation's
education product, "I
Can Learn" software.  
(SOURCE--Michael
Luke/WWLTV.com)
The Stockton product,
produced by Success
for All, one more 501(c)
corporation, turns out
to have not been
approved by the State
of California; when
SUSD discovered this
they dropped the
product.
(SOURCE--
KCRA.com)   
In Anthony's
defense, Success for
All's product is included
in the What Works
Clearinghouse, part of
the United States
Department of
Education.  In what can
only be described as
interesting timing,
WWC just last month
released a new report
on Success for All.

Propitious, that.
advantage of lax state,
federal and local over-
sight of Title I funds
intended for disadvan-
taged minority and
disabled students,
funneling $4.3 million into
their private coffers during
2000 to 2005.

As Utah's former state
coordinator of Title I and
Migrant Education for the
Utah State Office of
Education, in his next gig
as Davis School District's
federal grant writer, John
was in a unique position
to identify and funnel
funds to his wife via two
shell corporations they
allegedly established,
Research & Development
Consultants, Inc. and
Notable Education Writing
Service (NEWS).  
Federal prosecutors have
charged long-time
educators Susan G. Ross
and her husband John
Ross (below) with taking
Pilfering may have
begun in 1985;
Susan's copycat
secretary.
"Federal investigators
suspect that the Ross's
pilfering dates to
1985, and they fear that
millions more will remain
unaccounted for.  With
audits required yearly and
school-board approval
needed to sign off on
most purchases, the
question looms of how
John Ross and his wife,
Susan, could have carried
out the alleged scheme
year after year, according
to prosecutors."
 (Ibid.)  
Susan had worked for
Davis schools from the
1970s until 2006 when
"auditors found federal
money was going to a
company that didn't
appear to be a viable
business NEWS.  Davis
superintendent Bryan
Bowles said he
immediately asked Susan
Ross — John Ross had
already retired —about
embezzlement and she
denied it. Bowles said the
next day she went on
vacation and never
returned to work."
(SOURCE--
Tiffany Erickson, Jennifer Toomer-
Cook, Joseph M. Dougherty/Deseret
Morning News)
Another federal indictment
"charges that Susan
Ross' secretary, Stella
Smith, had a separate
scheme running.
According to a 37-count
indictment, Smith
submitted paperwork to
the school district to have
E.B. Smith Co. approved
as a vendor. Using that
company name, Smith
submitted purchase
orders for books that had
not been requested by
district employees.  Once
purchase orders were
issued, according to the
indictment, Smith mailed
fraudulent invoices
showing that E.B. Smith
Co. had supplied
the books. However, no
such books were
delivered. The indictment
says that Smith collected
about $338,000 in
fictitious book purchases
between 1999 and 2005.
Smith faces up to 20 years
in prison for each count of
mail fraud.  
(Ibid.)
ANOTHER
MOONLIGHTING
SUPE'S TIES TO
OTHER 501(c)
VENDORS (TEXAS)
During Hector
Montenegro's brief
(six-month) tenure last
year as Arlington ISD
superintendent he
persuaded his
cash-strapped district
(they were $20 million in
the hole at the time) to
purchase $240,000 in
education programs from
501(c) vendor HOPE, an
outfit he'd also accepted
speaking honorariums
from -- in violation of a
new state law.

As it turns out another
issue was Hector's
relationship with two
other 501(c) vendors,
AVID and Education
Research &
Development Institute
(ERDI); although he
sought legal opinions
from Texas Association
of School Administrators
attorney Neal Adams, the
opinion apparently came
too late as Hector quit his
contractual employment
agreement with Arlington
ISD without a buyout after
his dispute with his
board became the stuff of
local headlines for
months.

Contracts resulting from
his ERDI, HOPE and
AVID contacts were
potentially worth millions
to the vendors.
Although the tiny (485
K-12) students district was
chronically behind in its
bookkeeping, audits have
been clean, including one
released three months
ago, and the loss was not
discovered until New
Mexico State Auditor
Hector Balderas stepped
in.   The scheme appears
to have centered on 538
checks stolen from the
district and made payable
to Kathy and others; the
district's superintendent for
much of the period
involved was her cousin
Robert Archuleta, now
working elsewhere.  
Balderas has also
announced an
investigation of Northwest
Regional Educational
Cooperative #2 where
Kathy also worked as
business manager.

The Rio Grande Sun has
called for the resignation
of the entire school board
(see greybar at right) or a
recall election.  Although
board members have
refused to take
responsibility for their
roles, trustee Mark
Valdez said recently, "Now,
obviously, I really want to
educate myself more on
finances.”  No telling when
he'll get the chance as the
state DOE has taken over
Jemez bookkeeping.
With only a $4.2 million
annual budget, even  
Jemez Mountain School
District had sufficient
funds coming in that for
seven years no one in a
leadership position
appears to have noticed
the loss of $3.4 million
from their coffers.
Kathy Borrego (top);
Robert Archuleta
Anthony Amato
(GRAPHIC-Willamette Weekly)
Hector Montenegro (L) at
TALAS reception in his honor
at Jan. 2008 edu-conference
District is much smaller (a
$4.2 million annual than
the three described at left,
their long-time bookkeeper
Kathy Borrego has been
charged with embezzling
$3.4 million over seven
years from a $4.2 annual
operating budget.

The loss has already had
at least two major effects:  
Along with closing an
elementary school, the
district has had to move to
a four-day school week.  
Davis USD (CA) school board meeting
(PHOTO--Peyton Wolcott)
low-level administrators and teachers, in reality
curriculum-purchasing decisions rest in the hands of
the superintendent and the majority handful votes he or
she needs on the school board.
Susan and John Ross
(PHOTOS--Sarah Ause/Deseret News)
YACHTGATE:  TECH
EXEC'S TIE TO $120
MILLION E-RATE
VENDOR (TEXAS)
09.17.09 STATUS (ROSS)
According to Melodie Rydalch, spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's
office in Salt Lake City, the next hearing is a motion tomorrow,
September 18; John Ross is seeking to separate his case from
his wife's; according to legal pundits, this is because women
traditionally receive lighter sentences.

09.17.09 STATUS (SMITH)
Stella has pleaded guilty to mail fraud which carries a possible
20-year sentence and a $250,000 fine.  Although she has
agreed to repay Davis SD $324,579.28, she will not be
sentenced until the Ross cases conclude; theoretically she may
be legally able to float the due amount for as long as the Rosses
manage to stretch out their respective trials.   According to
Rydalch, "Once [Stella Smith] is sentenced, that is something
U.S. Probation will monitor based on what the judge orders at
sentencing. "
While streamlining polyglot state standards into one
smooth national set might seem to some a logical
next step, a means of consolidating the vagaries and
weaknesses of the No Child Left Behind Act, for
many of us not only should NCLB itself be discarded
but also the United States Department of Education
and E-Rate and other federal funding to local
schools along with it.  Billions of dollars later, the
de-segregation issues the feds sought to correct still
exist.
Ark where the Ark of the
Covenant disappears into a
vast government warehouse
never to be seen again.  

For the fearless among you,
try holding Los Angeles
Unified or New York City
schools accountable; see
how long it takes to get
anyone to respond to your
phone call, let alone obtain
any substantive information.
 

Not only will consolidating
our 15,000 local school
districts not save us a
single sou (more re why
below), but for
self-governing free citizens
of a representational
republic, nationalized
schools are also troubling,
a flat-out bum notion.
bean counters looking out for IBM's best interests;
once folks figure out how to access the larger pot
of money consolidation creates, the same fraud
and excesses begin to reoccur -- but now there
are fewer responsible eyes watching.  A good
analogy is the warehouse scene from the end of
Raiders of the Lost
commercial interests, compromised
trustees and administrators, and
politicians.  Students' time and
energy are wasted on fluff. Rather
than learning basics, self-reliance
and individual effort, feelings &
process are emphasized and kids
are taught to be part of a team and
get jobs.
By Peyton Wolcott
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
FROM LOU'S LIPS TO
GOD'S EARS:  Former IBM
chair Louis V. Gerstner, Jr.
outlined his 3 steps to
nationalization in his
December 2008 Wall Street
Journal op-ed entitled "Let's
abolish local school districts
and adopt national standards."
The first two have already
transpired (convene the nation's
governors, get them to call for
national standards).  Next is to
nationalize the nation's
schools, which -- he didn't
mention -- will be done via the
so-called Common Core
Standards and Title I funding.
As you read this, look for signs
of logic & accountability;
I couldn't find any; Lou starts
from a flawed premise and
builds from there.  --Peyton
Arne Duncan and Lou Gerstner are pushing for national standards and consolidation: Bye-bye local rule.  
Bye-bye self-determinism.  Hello, central oligarchy.
Today, Education, Inc. focuses more on adults' money,
power and careers than our kids. Our nation's Taj Mahal public schools are run by a corrupt oligarchy of
Lou Gerstner (L) & Arne Duncan
Havana street today
Just as the CIA listens for signs of increased chatter in
certain quarters, so too those of us wanting better
schools also keep our ears keened for trouble.
Some of the most
disquieting comes from
three corrupt urban
centers -- New York,
Chicago and DC
-- centering around a
White House with more
AIG & SunAmerica financial tycoon
and housing magnate
Eli Broad (L)
with Arne Duncan at Broad Jan.
2009 inaugural dinner; Broad gave
Democrats $115,437 in 2008.
(PHOTO -- Stuart  Ramson)
Let's face it. The natural end game of consolidating
schools and standards -- nationalization -- carries
at least three worrying implications.

Social progressives in this country have always
wanted a centralized national system.  One, it’s
easier to indoctrinate children when they're all on the
same page.  Two, he who funds the formula gets to
write the formula and therefore controls the outcome.
Three, by eliminating local control you get rid of
pesky moms and dads able to ask questions about
Johnny’s textbooks and noisy taxpayers wanting and
expecting a real dialogue about spending.  
From Lou’s pen to Arne’s mouth
Last December when former IBM CEO Louis Gerstner called for national standards and
consolidation (see greybar at far right); he suggested that the new president convene
More about the
feds' push for
national standards
The Common Core
State Standards
Initiative, a massive
conglomerate of
business and political
special interests, is  
spearheaded by the
National Governors
Association and the
Council of Chief State
School Officers, along
with Achieve, Inc.,
ACT, and the College
Board.

To their credit, four
states—Alaska, Texas,
South Carolina
and Missouri—have
declined to participate.
(SOURCE--CCSSO)
Eli Broad's 42 contributions to
Democrats (total$115,437)

question: aren't 501(c)3
organizations supposed to
not be political?

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 N/A $10,000 10/18/2008 P DEMOCRATIC
STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF CA - FEDERAL -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024  $-5,000 09/22/2008 P HILLARY CLINTON
FOR PRESIDENT -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD FOUNDATION $2,300
08/28/2008 P FRIENDS OF HILLARY -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Self employed/Founder $5,000 07/30/2008 P
HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Founder $2,000
07/11/2008 P WESPAC -
SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 ELI BROAD FOUNDATION/PHILANTROPIST
$900 06/23/2008 P JEANNE
SHAHEEN FOR SENATE -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Founder $2,500
06/02/2008 P SOLIDARITY PAC

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Founder $1,000
03/31/2008 G FRIENDS OF CONGRESSMAN
GEORGE MILLER -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Founder $10,000
02/29/2008 P DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL
CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD FOUNDATION/FOUNDER $200
01/22/2008 P FRIENDS OF SENATOR CARL LEVIN -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD FOUNDATION/FOUNDER
$2,300 01/22/2008 G FRIENDS OF SENATOR CARL
LEVIN - Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90049 BROAD FOUNDATION/FOUNDER $2,300
11/29/2007 P FRIENDS OF MARK WARNER -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 BROAD FOUNDATION/FOUNDER $1,300
11/21/2007 P FRIENDS OF MAX BAUCUS -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Founder $1,000
10/29/2007 G FRIENDS OF RAHM EMANUEL -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90049 The Broad Foundation/Founder $10,000
10/12/2007 P DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL
CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 SunAmerica Inc./Chairman $1,000
09/21/2007 P SHERMAN FOR CONGRESS -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Founder $1,000
09/19/2007 P BERMAN FOR CONGRESS -
Democrat

Broad, Eli Mr.
LOS ANGELES,, CA
90024 The Broad Foundations/SELF EMPLOYED
$1,000 09/18/2007 P BUCK MCKEON FOR
CONGRESS -
Republican

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundations/Founder $2,000
08/27/2007 P L A PAC - None

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 SUNAMERICA, INC./EXECUTIVE $1,000
08/14/2007 P FRIENDS OF MAX BAUCUS -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Eli Broad/Entrepeneur $2,100 07/13/2007 P
MATSUI FOR CONGRESS -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90291 THE BROAD FOUNDATION/FOUNDER
$2,300 06/25/2007 P RICHARDSON FOR
PRESIDENT INC. - Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Founder $2,300
06/14/2007 P LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD FOR
CONGRESS -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundations/Founder $5,000
06/01/2007 P FUND FOR THE MAJORITY

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Executive $2,300
05/30/2007 G NANCY PELOSI FOR CONGRESS -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Executive $2,300
05/30/2007 P NANCY PELOSI FOR CONGRESS -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Broad Foundations/Founder $1,000
05/30/2007 P FRIENDS OF PATRICK J. KENNEDY
INC. -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 SUN AMERICA/CHAIRMAN, CEO & PRESIDE
$2,437 05/01/2007 P LAUTENBERG FOR SENATE -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Broad Foundation/Founder $2,500
04/30/2007 P SECUREUS

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Founder $15,000
04/30/2007 P DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL
CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Self employed/Founder $2,300 03/28/2007 G
HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT - Democrat
Broad, Eli

LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Self employed/Founder $2,300 03/28/2007 P
HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT - Democrat
Broad, Eli

LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundations/Founder $1,000
03/27/2007 P CHRIS DODD FOR PRESIDENT INC -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 Broad Foundation/Chairman-Founder $1,200
03/26/2007 P TOM VILSACK FOR PRESIDENT -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD FOUNDATIONS/FOUNDER $200
03/23/2007 P FRIENDS OF BARBARA BOXER -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD FOUNDATIONS/FOUNDER $200
03/23/2007 G FRIENDS OF BARBARA BOXER -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 SUNAMERICA INSURANCE
CO/PRESIDENT/C $2,300 03/16/2007 P CITIZENS
FOR HARKIN -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Founder $2,300
02/16/2007 P FRIENDS OF CONGRESSMAN
GEORGE MILLER -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Founder $200
02/16/2007 G FRIENDS OF CONGRESSMAN
GEORGE MILLER -
Democrat

Broad, Eli
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 The Broad Foundation/Founder $2,300
02/16/2007 P FRIENDS OF RAHM EMANUEL -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD FOUNDATION/FOUNDER
$10,000 02/15/2007 P DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL
CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE -
Democrat

BROAD, ELI
LOS ANGELES, CA
90024 THE BROAD FOUNDATIONS/FOUNDER
$2,100 01/12/2007 P FRIENDS OF SENATOR CARL
LEVIN -
Democrat
This comes at the same
time as our White House
is intent on expanding
federal powers in a push
driven by more czars than
in all of Russian history, a
putsch into whose hands
the concentration of ever
more money and power
will be given to an
oligarchical elite via
consolidation and
national standards of our
local schools gives
pause.  
vehicular dynasty, and J.P. Morgan, the king of
capitalist finance.  Men like these, and the brilliant
efficiency expert Frederick W. Taylor, who
inspired the entire "social efficiency" movement of
the early twentieth century, along with providing
the new Soviet Union its operating philosophy and
doing the same job for Fascist Italy and Nazi
Germany; men who dreamed bigger dreams than
any had dreamed since Napoleon or Charlemagne,
these were the makers of modern schooling.
America's movement away from
rationality towards emotionalism
under the "It's all for the
children" banner; the players:

  • socialist liberal idealogues
  • industrialists wanting compliant
    workers
  • vendors facing shrinking
    markets
3 factors that swamped
U.S. public education
czars than in all of Russian history wanting to
concentrate ever more money and power in the
hands of an oligarchical elite via consolidation and
national standards for our public schools.
a meeting of our nation‘s
governors and persuade
them to adopt national
standards and consoli-
date our 15,000 local
school districts into 70.  

Apparently someone at
the White House was
listening -- or was it a
decade of money (see
graph at right) given to
liberal politicians?

From Arne's mouth
to state reality
However it happened, as
if on cue, by this past June
Liberal education lobbying has almost quintupled in just 2 decades.
new Secretary of Education Arne Duncan was at a podium -- surprise, surprise --
proposing national standards --
surprise, surprise -- to the Governors Education
Symposium.  In Arne's hand, a big carrot:  
$ 350 million in stimulus funds for those
state leaders greedy enough to go along.  (For the politically naive among you, as I
myself was until well into adulthood, every dollar that passes through a governor's
hands represents dollars for repaying friends, contracts and favors.  Much as we'd like
to hope that every penny of the $350 million will go to the best and most deserving
projects, the simple fact is that Ideas' purity fade when government money is attached.)

The implication of course is that for those governors willing to go along they'll get a
bigger slice of the larger prize, $4.35 billion, or even some of the $100 billion total feds
are earmarking for education.

Forty-six governors in need of repaying friends, contracts and favors have already
signed on to Arne's national standards scheme.
 

(MARCH 2010 UPDATE:  Only Texas is standing firm; a spokesman for
Alaska's DOE told me in January they were going to sign on to the second
round of grant requests.)  

















Developing . . . .
Hitler Youth
Start small, start  local, start stimple   -   One person asking one question at their local school  -   Solutions, not Fear
Charlotte Iserbyt's 'The Deliberate
Dumbing Down of America'
It's important that we understand the
century of events leading to where we
are now.  You can read this book
online, today, for
free.
LOU GERSTNER'S MANIFESTO
March 25, 2010 UPATE

HOW WE
(NOT 'THEY' BUT YOU AND I)
CAN STOP NATIONALIZATION

The fix is already in at the state and national levels.  

Start small, start local and start simple.

Ask questions in your own local public schools.  

Get rid of fuzzy math.

Make sure kids are drilled in the basic math tables in the first
four grades and that they're learning phonics and accurate
U.S. and world history.

Get the check register online.

Take a piece of what's closest to you and start asking
questions, all kinds of questions about spending.  

Find qualified candidates to serve on your local school board
and get them to sign the voluntary ethics pledges -- without
them even the best candidates seem to throw their campaign
promises ('Read my lips, no new taxes') out the window and
develop a case of everyone-wants-to-be-loved-itis, or to
morph into self-appointed peacemakers.

Defeat attempts to consolidate your school district with
others; if your school board members are elected from
single-member districts, move your schools back to at-large
districts.
 (There's no faster way for administrators and
vendors to squelch opposition than single-member
districts.)

Ask your elected politicians at all levels to defend their votes
and spending re education.

Find your Congressman's pork on the Congressional Record,
ask him/her to defend, say, a jump in one year from $12
million to $108 million.

Ask to see your elected paid politicians' appointments
calendar, including golf and all social engagements -- whom
did they meet with, where and why?  Your politician knows;
you're paying him/her and they're spending your money.  
You deserve full accountability.

Go about all of this with as friendly a tone as you can
manage, and be sure to take the Golden Rule with you.  

This is my plan and it's based on observing personal past
experiences, mine and others, wins and losses both.

What's yours?
Mr. & Mrs. Louis V. Gerstner, Jr.
(PHOTO -- New York Social Diary)
NAZI acronym:

Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei

(National Socialist German Workers' Party)
Adolph Hitler with children
More historical public school photographs:
De-Consolidation the answer, not consolidation
Whether it be three-way transactions involving moonlighting
superintendents and 501(c) corporations, or embezzlements
involving millions including unsupervised Title I funds, or a
fishing boat used as a lure for a major urban district's
technology chief's control of E-Rate dollars, there are reasons
aplenty why de-consolidation rather than consolidation is the
better direction for public education.   

Consolidation merely creates more opportunities for more
fraud and less accountability.

The proof is in the pudding.  Not one of our major urban
districts are doing well; not even Eli Broad -- despite his
foundation's handsomely publicized $1 million annual prize --
can give us a detailed quantitative assessment as to how he
picks his winners.  Similarly -- but unsurprisingly, neither Arne
Duncan nor the US Department of Education -- offered a
quantitative accounting of their in awarding Race to the Top
grants; if you'll take the time to analyze which states got the
money, look at the politics for each grant.

Historically, totalitarians' first goal is to centralize power.  
Sometimes it's overnight; often it's baby step by baby step.

We're that frog in the frying pan and the water's starting to
boil; what will you do?  

Decades from now, when your children and grandchildren ask
this question, what will you tell them?
Online check registers are moms' and dads' and taxpayers'
surest route through the giant public education warehouse --
how do you have a meaningful conversation with a bar graph
or a pie chart -- and are also superintendents' best friend right
now, a way to build community support for locally run schools.
Ark of the Covenant disappearing into
WW II-era government warehouse.
 
(IMAGE--Raiders of the Lost Ark)
What did you do, Mommy and
Daddy, to participate in the
Great War against socialism?